Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Rebecca Sramkova vs Victoria Kan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sramkova vs Kan analysis and find out who is favored!
Rebecca Sramkova vs Victoria Kan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sramkova 1 - 0 Kan
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sramkova has won 48.63% of points on his second serve, while Kan has won 48.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sramkova, in recent form, has won 56.52% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kan has won 57.54%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.25% and 44.49% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sramkova has saved 55.07% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kan has saved 63.11% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sramkova has won 63.89% of matches played (W/L 46/ 26), with Kan winning 70.37% (W/L 19/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sramkova has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 235/ 126), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 54/ 49). Kan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 75% (W/L 295/ 96), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 20/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Sramkova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 26/ 13), where as Kan has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 72% of matches (W/L 18/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sramkova winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sramkova winning 2 and Kan winning 0. The last match between Sramkova and Kan was at the W25 St. Poelten, 11-09-2019, First, Clay with Rebecca Sramkova getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sramkova and Kan have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sramkova winning 0 times and Kan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sramkova winning 0, and Kan 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sramkova has played against opponents with an average rank of 202.08 while Kan has played against players with an average rank of 87.41.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sramkova has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kan has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sramkova has converted 45.91% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kan has converted 59.22% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
101
Rank
89
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
694
Rank
151
High
28
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
61% (392-246)
Career Total W/L
71% (358-148)
67% (22-11)
YTD W/L
62% (8-5)
$631,328
Career Prize Money
$30,766
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Rebecca Sramkova | Victoria Kan |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:0:0 | 1:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (43/63) | 53% (18/34) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (33/43) | 39% (7/18) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 35% (7/20) | 31% (5/16) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 14% (1/7) |
| Return Points W% | 65% (22/34) | 37% (23/63) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Victoria Kan
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
18 of
34)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Rebecca Sramkova | Victoria Kan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (22/11) | 62% (8/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (48/29) | 66% (19/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (405/346) | 59% (148/104) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 71% (5/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 69% (11/5) | 50% (2/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 86% (6/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.23 | 0.19 |
| Aces Total | 86 | 23 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 68 | 28 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:51 | 1:37:4 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 190.48 | 11.77 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1557/2484) | 55% (503/914) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (980/1557) | 63% (316/503) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (455/927) | 48% (198/411) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (148/322) | 59% (61/103) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (1171/2549) | 49% (390/793) |
| Slam W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 71% (10/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 73% (8/3) | 64% (7/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 66% (21/32) | 62% (8/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 58% (7/12) | 0% (0/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (22/19) | 100% (8/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (22/3) | 0% (8/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (11/3) | 0% (5/0) |
Rebecca Sramkova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
5
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Panna Udvardy
62%
(
72 of
117)
1st Serve %
67%
(
91 of
135)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
58 of
91)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
42%
(
49 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
63 of
135)
131
Total Points Won
121
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Linda Fruhvirtova
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Sarah Iliev
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
57%
(
62 of
108)
1st Serve %
71%
(
82 of
116)
7
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
50 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
55 of
116)
113
Total Points Won
111
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Sofia Kenin
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
44 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Katie Boulter
60%
(
61 of
101)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Georgia Pedone
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Darja Semenistaja
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
47%
(
32 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Harriet Dart
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Victoria Kan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Victoria Kan
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
93)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
0
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victoria Kan
Player
Rinon Okuwaki
42%
(
25 of
60)
1st Serve %
77%
(
33 of
43)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Snigur
Player
Victoria Kan
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Victoria Kan
Player
Amarni Banks
47%
(
28 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Kan
Player
Marine Szostak
40%
(
27 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
8
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
48%
(
32 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fabienne Gettwart
Player
Victoria Kan
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Victoria Kan
Player
Emma Slavikova
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nina Vargova
Player
Victoria Kan
79%
(
79 of
100)
1st Serve %
51%
(
62 of
121)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
121)
114
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Kan
Player
Maria Eleni Poulka
41%
(
12 of
29)
1st Serve %
44%
(
16 of
36)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
92%
(
11 of
12)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
8 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
49
Total Points Won
16
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lola Radivojevic
Player
Victoria Kan
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
65%
(
85 of
130)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
48 of
85)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
58 of
130)
109
Total Points Won
106
|
6-3 1-6 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
view more
Sramkova Vs Kan Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
